ATLAS OF LANGUAGE

AT-133-019 · ATLAS 260

Postulate of meaning

A formalized rule that establishes necessary semantic relationships between expressions.

Part of the subject path Semantics and Signs

Why is this entry in the Atlas?

A · Analytical concept R1 · Distinct contribution to understanding

Meaning postulates expose inferences built into the semantic rules of a formal system. They distinguish a stipulated meaning relation from a claim that still requires empirical investigation.

Colours and admission grounds

The rectangular label identifies the entry function: F – linguistic figure or procedure; A – analytical concept; G – foundational concept; E – selected concrete case. The rounded badge indicates the admission ground: R1 – distinctive contribution; R2 – necessary foundation; R3 – justified illustrative case. This editorial rationale explains the current selection rather than claiming an undocumented original selection history.

Explanation

A meaning postulate is a formally stated condition that records a necessary semantic relationship between expressions. It may specify, for example, that anything satisfying one predicate must also satisfy a more general predicate, or that two properties are incompatible. Unlike contingent world knowledge, the postulate is intended to follow from conventional linguistic meaning. It introduces lexical knowledge into a logical model without requiring every expression to be exhaustively decomposed into primitive features. The conceptual movement isolates a stable inference, formalises it, and then asks whether it holds across all linguistically relevant contexts or merely reflects a typical, cultural, or factual expectation.

Movement of thought

1. A recurring inferential relationship between linguistic expressions is stated explicitly. 2. The analysis tests whether the inference comes from conventional meaning or world knowledge. 3. The relation is represented as implication, exclusion, or another formal condition. 4. Counterexamples and possible situations test whether the claimed connection is genuinely necessary. 5. Only robust relationships are retained as components of the semantic model.

Scientific use case

Formal semantics, lexical knowledge representation, and automated inference use meaning postulates to model hyponymy, incompatibility, and selection restrictions. Their scope must be constrained by speaker judgements and contextual variation.

Example

A model states that anything truthfully described as a bachelor is also an unmarried adult man. The rule explains a lexical inference without claiming to provide an exhaustive definition.

Counterexample

The expectation that birds normally fly is not automatically a meaning postulate, because flightless birds create no linguistic contradiction. A postulate must capture a necessary semantic relationship rather than a strong everyday expectation.

Distinction

A meaning postulate belongs to the semantic specification of a formal system; not every legal or administrative definition is therefore a meaning postulate. Distinguish a meaning postulate from a definition, encyclopaedic knowledge, a default rule, and an empirical generalisation. It fixes selected necessary relations without analysing every component of an expression's meaning.

Effect on thought and perception

Meaning postulates make implicit lexical inferences computationally and argumentatively visible. They create order but may mistakenly solidify contingent norms as necessary linguistic meaning.

Resonance

An invisible commitment runs between two expressions: once one is asserted, the other answers as a necessary consequence. The postulate traces this line of semantic tension.

Cite this entry

Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Postulate of meaning“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-133-019. ATLAS 260, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-133-019

https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-133-019

The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.

Historical background

Book I, chapter VIII of Mill's System of Logic treats defining a name as specifying its connoted attributes. It separates analysis of a name from claims about the things named. This supplies a logical predecessor for studying semantic commitments, not a direct witness to the modern formal device called a meaning postulate.

How conceptual history changes the analysis

Test whether the inference follows from an adopted meaning or from observation. A definition does not prove a new fact.

References for the historical section

Historical source evidence and Atlas applications remain separate; this import does not assert new first attestations or a fresh exhaustive source verification.