Explanation
Hypertext organises textual components as a network of selectable links so that reading order is not completely predetermined. A link connects nodes but offers no neutral freedom: wording, visibility, position, technical accessibility, and the number of possible routes guide choice. Readers produce a concrete sequence from these offers, returning, jumping, or abandoning a path. Not every digital text is hypertext, while printed cross-references may possess hypertextual features; what matters is the operative linking of separate components. Non-linearity therefore does not mean absence of order but a different distribution of decisions between author and reader. The movement leaves a single prescribed line, follows a relation, and produces a particular textual form in passage, while paths not selected continue to resonate as visible possibilities.
Movement of thought
1. Several textual nodes first exist with their own content and possible relations without prescribing one complete reading sequence. 2. Links mark selectable transitions and, through wording, position, and design, create expectations about their destinations. 3. Readers choose a route, connect reached nodes in memory, and construct a concrete temporary sequence. 4. A counter-test separates operative linking from mere screen display, linear page navigation, and an unordered collection of materials. 5. The text returns as a travelled path whose meaning includes both the reached sequence and awareness of branches not taken.
Scientific use case
Media studies, information architecture, and reading research analyse link semantics, navigation paths, abandonment, orientation, and accessibility. Privacy-preserving logs are combined with qualitative reading protocols.
Example
An atlas profile links to a neighbouring concept, a source, and a path of thought. Following the neighbour creates a different argumentative sequence from opening the source first.
Counterexample
A novel appears on screen as an unchangeable sequence of scanned pages, while “next” only turns to the following page. Digital display alone does not make it hypertext.
Distinction
Distinguish it from digital text, website, intertextuality, database, footnote, table of contents, internet language, and hypertext rhetoric; selectable operative linking is its structural feature.
Effect on thought and perception
Hypertext enables multiperspectival, updateable knowledge spaces and active exploration, but can disperse orientation, distort importance through link design, and hide unlinked content.
Resonance
A sentence opens a door into another text; the chosen route draws its own line through the network while untaken possibilities remain illuminated at every crossing.
Etymology
Technical core term; individual etymological review pending
Provenance
ATLAS 241 residual-case triage → profile candidate 241-A → source and neighbourhood cross-check → ATLAS 242
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Hypertext“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-CORE-242-029. ATLAS 260, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-CORE-242-029The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.
Historical background
Nelson’s 1965 paper expressly introduces hypertext for interconnected written or pictorial material whose complexity cannot conveniently be represented on paper. The witness inspected is a later anthology reprint. Annotations, maps of contents, and structures able to accommodate growth and rearrangement form part of the proposal. This documents a technical introduction, not an exhaustive invention history, German adoption, or identity with the later Web.
How conceptual history changes the analysis
Hypertext organizes relationships and possible reading paths; a visible link alone does not explain the structure or its evolution.
References for the historical section
- HC-C-NELSON · Reprint printed144, PDF11; original-publication attribution printed134, PDF1 (1-based)