Explanation
Peristasis presents the circumstances in which an action, statement, or decision occurs. Time, place, participants, occasion, means, and preceding conditions form a ring around the event and alter its weight. Contextualisation can correct premature judgement, but it must not dissolve responsibility. Analysis separates event core from circumstantial fields, determines each factor's causal, normative, or interpretive relevance, and checks sources. It also asks which circumstances are selected or omitted and whether identical conditions are evaluated by the same standard for different actors.
Movement of thought
1. The event core is first formulated as neutrally as possible without explanatory circumstances. 2. Time, place, actors, occasion, means, and prior conditions are gathered and evidenced separately. 3. Each circumstance is classified as causal, enabling, constraining, normative, or merely atmospheric. 4. Omitted conditions and comparison cases test selectivity and unequal standards of evaluation. 5. Event and context are reconnected without entirely dissolving agency or responsibility.
Scientific use case
Rhetoric and historical, legal, conversation, and social research analyse peristasis with contextual matrices and source comparison. It helps test decontextualised quotations and distinguish explanation, excuse, and retrospective framing.
Example
“In the crowded hall, after three hours without information and immediately following the cancellation, a single slow round of applause began.” Circumstances alter the action's meaning.
Counterexample
Decorative background or arbitrary abundance of detail is not peristasis. The circumstances must perceptibly change interpretation or evaluation of the event.
Distinction
Distinguish peristasis from topographia, chronographia, deixis, and dicaeologia. Peristasis gathers relevant circumstances; topographia and chronographia focus place and time, while dicaeologia justifies conduct.
Effect on thought and perception
Peristasis makes the conditioned nature of action visible and can enable fairer judgement. Used selectively, it may relativise responsibility or inflate peripheral circumstances into dominant explanation.
Resonance
A ring of time, place, occasion, and participation forms around an event node. Each condition changes the event's echo without wholly replacing its own impulse.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Peristasis“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-HAR9-0006. ATLAS 260, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-HAR9-0006The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.
Historical background
Peacham's 1593 peristasis amplifies a case through circumstances, including those of persons and things. His examples attach period-specific moral judgments to social position, origin and age. Bullinger's 1898 entry more broadly names the description of circumstances and distinguishes their vivid use to move emotion as diaskeue. The witnesses show related but differently focused handbook accounts, without proving direct transmission between them.
How conceptual history changes the analysis
Circumstances can describe a situation or give it argumentative weight; historical stereotypes require explicit attribution.