Explanation
Easy Language is a rule-governed, especially comprehensible language form intended to reduce linguistic and cognitive barriers for defined target groups. It uses short structures, explained terminology, clear organisation, supportive layout, and often review by people from the target group. It is not merely simplified standard language and should not be confused with a general stylistic recommendation. Responsible adaptation selects and explains content transparently; it must not silently change meaning or patronise adult readers. The concept makes accessibility a communicative quality in its own right: comprehensibility arises not in the text alone but through rules, design, prior knowledge, situation of use, and participation by those for whom access is created.
Movement of thought
1. A source text first presents linguistic, conceptual, or design demands that may exclude some readers from access. 2. Target group and use situation are specified before content, wording, syntax, structure, and media are redesigned. 3. Concepts are explained, information steps reduced, and visual guidance used to support independent use. 4. A counter-test involves target-group readers and checks semantic loss, patronisation, false simplification, and functional completeness. 5. The content returns in a more accessible version whose differences, selections, and review status remain transparent.
Scientific use case
Comprehensibility, translation, and participation research can measure rule application, task performance, memory, and independent decision-making. Participatory review also examines dignity, naturalness, and actual usefulness.
Example
A consent text presents each action in a separate line, avoids hidden assumptions, explains technical terms, and is reviewed before publication by members of its intended audience.
Counterexample
A text replaces a few long words with short ones while retaining nested arguments, unclear reference, and untested layout. Word length alone does not produce rule-governed Easy Language.
Distinction
Distinguish Easy Language from Plain Language, comprehensible standard language, child-directed speech, and abridgement. It follows a specific rule and review framework for particular target groups.
Effect on thought and perception
Easy Language can increase access, autonomy, and participation; poor versions may lose information, stigmatise readers, or offer only apparent accessibility.
Resonance
A difficult text changes rhythm, wording, and form until more people can answer it independently; their review becomes part of the emerging linguistic current.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Easy Language“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-DEP5-0011. ATLAS 260, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-DEP5-0011The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.
Historical background
Kellermann’s 2014 overview situates German Leichte Sprache within self-advocacy and organised accessibility work, including Mensch zuerst (2001), Netzwerk Leichte Sprache (2006) and Inclusion Europe’s 2009 rules. Audience participation is central. English “Easy Language” is a broad label; “easy read” may be closer in particular settings, while neither is simply identical to “plain language”.
How conceptual history changes the analysis
Short sentences do not automatically produce accessible communication. Check whether the intended audience understands the action required, and specify the relevant easy-read or plain-language tradition.
Additional example
Uncertified illustration: “Please bring your identity document.” Countercheck: The shorter “ID!” may leave the required action unclear.
References for the historical section
- Gudrun Kellermann (2014): Leichte und Einfache Sprache – Versuch einer Definition. · 19. Februar 2014; Entwicklung von Mensch zuerst, Netzwerk Leichte Sprache und europäischen Regeln.