Explanation
A sequence such as A–B–B′–A′ makes the returning phrase structure inspectable. The reference describes a phrase-level figure, not an abstract convergence of ideas. The German Atlas label Synantese is identified as an editorial correspondence; it does not establish a German first attestation.
Movement of thought
1. Mark the recurrent phrases. 2. Test their ordering as A–B–B′–A′ or a demonstrable related pattern. 3. Distinguish inversion from mere thematic resemblance.
Scientific use case
Rhetorical analysis marks phrase boundaries and tests the proposed inversion against the wording before interpreting its effect.
Example
Original structural example: “We test the words, we test the images; the images change our view, the words change our judgement.” The topics return in reversed order.
Counterexample
“Historical order and present use are important” adds two considerations. Without a staged encounter, countermovement, or reciprocal alteration, it is not synantesis in this reconstructed sense.
Distinction
Opposition or thematic convergence alone is insufficient. The repeated phrases and their inverted ordering must be identifiable.
Effect on thought and perception
Attention retraces a linguistically articulated sequence.
Resonance
The returning expression carries the intervening passage back into its earlier meaning.
Provenance
Accepted editorial clarification, 15 October 2026, packages D01–D11; original canonical evidence retained separately.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Synantesis (introverted repetition)“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-HAR11-0010. ATLAS 260, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-HAR11-0010The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.
Source-specific historical context · editorial revision
Bullinger’s 1898 Synantesis entry describes inverted phrase repetition. It supports the structural model, while the German correspondence Synantese remains an editorial designation, not a demonstrated German first attestation.
Status of this clarification
Editorially accepted on 15 October 2026. The sources and limitations named in the profile support this reading. A superseded conflicting profile is not displayed as an additional current explanation; the original evidence remains archived unchanged. This does not assert a new first attestation or exhaustive verification.