Explanation
Linearity is an order in which linguistic or medial elements are processed successively in a preferred sequence. Speech unfolds irreversibly in time; writing permits return but ordinarily offers directions and sequences as well. Linearity is therefore neither mere geometric straightness nor a property simply abolished by digital media. Hypertext creates choices, yet every concrete act of reading remains sequential in time and attention. Grammar, argument, and narrative use order to build expectation, mark dependencies, and allow later elements to act back upon earlier ones. Parallel fields, tables, and cross-reference may overlay this organisation without eliminating it. The movement shows how simultaneously available components become an actually travelled path and how each position receives meaning from what precedes and follows it.
Movement of thought
1. Several possible linguistic or medial elements first coexist as a stock or field of selection. 2. A medium, convention, or action orders them into a preferred temporal or spatial sequence. 3. Each reached position changes expectation and makes earlier material appear differently in light of what follows. 4. A counter-test separates sequential processing from geometric straightness and optional routes from complete simultaneity. 5. The travelled route returns as remembered structure; even branching becomes experience through a sequence of concrete choices.
Scientific use case
Media studies, text linguistics, and reading research measure order, regressions, gaze paths, and memory in continuous text, tables, and hypertext, separating layout structure from actual reception.
Example
A detective novel mentions a decisive object casually near the beginning and explains it only at the end. Later information retrospectively changes the earlier position's meaning.
Counterexample
A table presents several values simultaneously on one surface. As a person compares rows, the gaze still performs a sequence; the layout is not purely linear, but processing is not timeless either.
Distinction
Distinguish it from chronology, reading direction, narrativity, causality, one-dimensionality, and mathematical linearity; hypertext modifies but does not abolish sequential reception.
Effect on thought and perception
Linearity creates orientation, suspense, and cumulative reasoning, but can hide alternative connections and force complex simultaneity into an apparently natural sequence.
Resonance
A path forms from many possible points; each step carries the after-sound of the previous one and already tunes expectation for the next.
Etymology
Technical core term; individual etymological review pending
Provenance
ATLAS 241 residual-case triage → profile candidate 241-B → source and neighbourhood cross-check → ATLAS 243
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Linearity“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-CORE-243-016. ATLAS 260, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-CORE-243-016The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.
Historical background
The Cours grounds linearity in the temporal succession of the auditory signifier and contrasts visual signs with simultaneous multidimensional possibilities. Writing makes succession spatially inspectable. This French theoretical witness concerns the signifier; it does not imply that all thought or understanding is one-dimensional. German and English terminology histories remain incomplete.
How conceptual history changes the analysis
Separate the sequence of arriving forms from the network of their semantic relations. They need not have the same structure.
References for the historical section
- Ferdinand de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale (1916), edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye with Albert Riedlinger; French text in the 1971 Payot printing, Wikisource transcription · First Part, Chapter I, §3: linear character of the signifier
The original editorial preface and named French sections were read. The Cours is a posthumous editorial reconstruction from lectures, not Saussure’s completed manuscript. Later prefatory material is not treated as a 1916 witness. No English first-attestation claim; no full collation of the transcription with the first edition.